Sharon Fletcher will pull on her “Right here for Dafonte” T-shirt Friday and head to the Oshawa, Ont., courthouse for the decision within the trial of two males accused of beating Dafonte Miller — a case that has made headlines within the Toronto space and throughout the nation.

Regardless that the courthouse will likely be empty because of the novel coronavirus, she’ll stand with others exterior to point out her help for Miller — a younger Black man left blinded in a single eye throughout a confrontation with a police officer and his brother three-and-a-half years in the past.

Fletcher, a Black lady with grownup youngsters, says she will’t think about the potential for the brothers being discovered not responsible.

But when they’re convicted, “I feel that for the primary time in a very long time, it will really feel like Black lives actually do matter. That we’re counted and seen as human beings,” she instructed CBC Information.

Sharon Fletcher will attend a rally exterior the Oshawa courthouse placed on by the Durham Black Accountability Coalition supporting Dafonte Miller and his household. (Submitted by Sharon Fletcher)

Michael Theriault, a Toronto police officer who was off responsibility that evening in December 2016, and his youthful brother, Christian, each face costs of aggravated assault and obstruction of justice. The brothers have pleaded not responsible, telling the courtroom Miller attacked them that evening they usually had been defending themselves.

Ontario Superior Court docket Justice Joseph Di Luca will learn his judgment reside on a YouTube hyperlink that is being extensively shared by neighborhood members.

The proof within the trial was heard months earlier than folks took to the streets in the USA, Canada and around the globe to protest the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and different comparable instances. However Miller’s case has additionally drawn consideration to the similar points: anti-Black racism and police brutality.  

Michael and Christian Theriault each face costs of aggravated assault and obstruction of justice. (Lisa Xing/CBC)

2 vastly totally different variations of occasions offered in courtroom

The defence has argued it is not a case of race however of self-defence. The Crown contends there was no justification for the beating Miller suffered that evening.

Miller, who was 19 on the time of the incident, stated he was strolling down a residential road within the early morning hours in Whitby, Ont. — greater than 50 kilometres east of Toronto — with two buddies. He testified that the brothers, who had been at their father’s home, got here exterior and questioned them. He instructed the courtroom he ran and the Theriaults chased him, catching as much as him between two homes.

He stated they beat him — punching, kicking and hitting him with an object. He made his option to the entrance of a house and banged on the door for assist, however the beating continued.

House owner James Silverthorn, a district chief with Toronto Hearth Companies, was a Crown witness. He stated he awoke even earlier than the banging on the door to the sounds of screaming.

He appeared by way of his facet window and noticed two males beating one other man.

“It was steady. It was very laborious,” he instructed the courtroom.

He stated later, when the boys had moved to the entrance of his home, he noticed one man holding an object, stabbing down with it, to maintain the person on the bottom from getting up.

A protracted steel pole with blood on it was discovered on the scene.

Crown lawyer Linda Shin introduced out the lengthy steel pole discovered on the scene, questioning Durham Police Const. Jennifer Bowler concerning the piece of proof. (Pam Davies/CBC)

The Theriault brothers instructed the courtroom they caught Miller and one in every of his buddies breaking into their dad and mom’ car and that they had been attempting to apprehend him.

They testified that as soon as they caught as much as him, Miller was the one with a pipe and that he was hitting them.

Michael Theriault admitted in courtroom that he punched Miller repeatedly, as laborious as he might, attempting to disarm him. He stated he and his brother feared for his or her lives.

‘This case will not be about race,’ defence argued

In written closing submissions, the defence wrote: “This case will not be about race.” 

The narratives put ahead by Miller and his lawyer “bear no resemblance to what truly occurred,” their submission reads. 

The defence attorneys additionally argued Miller lied in courtroom when he denied breaking into vehicles that evening.

This picture of Miller after the beating was submitted as a part of courtroom proof. (Particular Investigations Unit)

Prosecutors stated even when Miller was breaking into vehicles, the extreme beating that brought about him to lose his left eye was not justified.

Lawyer Omar Ha-Redeye, govt director of the Durham Group Authorized Clinic, stated that regardless of the decide guidelines, he would not be stunned if he mentions the present local weather and the elevated concentrate on anti-Black racism.

“Though judges are primarily making a choice concerning the particular case that’s earlier than them, what they’re additionally doing is chatting with why the legislation is what it’s,” he stated.

“And so justice isn’t just achieved, but it surely should be seen to be achieved.” 

Ha-Redeye stated one constructive factor about having the choice streamed on-line because of the COVID-19 pandemic is that extra folks will be capable to watch the courtroom course of.

Miller’s on-line supporters stated the case is gathering consideration around the globe, so many who will be watching the choice could be doing so from exterior Canada.

In the meantime, Sharon Fletcher will likely be ready exterior the courthouse, hoping Di Luca will deliver down the responsible verdict she feels is simply and truthful.

“I feel it will put a bit extra religion within the present system.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here